this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
671 points (99.0% liked)

The Onion

4548 readers
1445 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Dismantling the nuclear plants was the correct decision. Why produce radioactive trash you cannot safely store? The mistake was selling out solar tech. Funny you use france as a positive example because their power plants are in terrible conditions.

[–] Crampon@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We have been safely storing nuclear "trash" for decades. Much of it isn't really considered trash as it will have potential for new energy in the future. Temporary storage is more correct.

France are planning to build six new plants.

Nuclear energy has potential for catastrophes sure. But annual deaths by nuclear disasters Vs. Any other energy sources is pretty funny.

Wind power is considered more lethal than nuclear.

People are just afraid of what they don't understand.

[–] Crazypartypony@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

Another point for nuclear, it actually works when it's not sunny and windy. Hot still days in the summer when everyone wants AC? No wind power. Terrible winter days that are super windy with no sun? Still no wind power because the wind is now too strong and will hurt the turbines, and no sun. Where's the heat coming from? Renewable sources are great, but the amount of storage they would need to be practical as a primary source of electricity is a bit prohibitive.