this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
731 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59693 readers
3123 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

they make clear to you that Facebook can and will have some metadata, but not the contents of the chat itself.

You thought you're safe and private when the content is encrypted? LOL, no. Metadata are much more useful to Facebook, and to the intelligence services.

“We Kill People Based on Metadata.” -- General Michael Hayden, former Director of NSA and CIA

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My point isn't that metadata isn't useful for them, there's no need to be condescending about things I never said.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

My point is metadata should be protected as content does. While IM platform needs to know which message should be delived to whom, they don't need that after being delivered, nor have it profiled.