this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
223 points (80.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27049 readers
2207 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The US is supporting Israel through what we can mostly all agree is a genocide of the Gazans. Clearly, Biden isn't a genocidal maniac, yet he's all in with unwavering support. Why are we doing this? There has to be a logical reason that isn't just "we want Israel to kill everyone in Gaza and take their land a la lebensraum."

We know this is an emotional topic, so please be respectful of each other so that we can have open and clear authentic discussion on the matter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The U.S. will NEVER give up a military foothold in the middle east.

They will, only once all the oil's been extracted, which will take some decades yet.

While it's not a religious conspiracy, there is plenty of religious support from certain christian denominations, on the USA and other countries, because of some weird interpretation of the bible about Israelis getting their "promised land" back.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not only about oil. I mean sure, some of it is but even without oil they'd want military access simply because of how much a hotspot it is.

I already told you this has nothing to do with religion and the fact you believe this means your sources aren't trustworthy.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh, you mean that people who use religion to preach support for isreal aren't real? The pastors in my country that do that during the cults and on TV must be a figment of my imagination, then!

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

And exactly what kind of impact do you think those religious nuts have on our top military brass's positions?

I find it funny that you moved the goalposts so readily. I don't have time for intellectually dishonest people.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

I never implied said religious support happened at or was directed at the top of the hierarchy, political or military. Why you came to that conclusion eludes me. Let me quote myself:

there is plenty of religious support from certain christian denominations, on the USA and other countries, because of some weird interpretation of the bible about Israelis getting their “promised land” back.

My intent was pointing out that this is to generate public support. But I guess I'm the one "moving the goalposts" and being "intellectually dishonest" because I'm not replying to what you thought I was saying implicitly. Next thing you'll tell me I'm trying to squirrel out of what you're wrongfully accusing me of.