this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
182 points (99.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40415 readers
351 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As the title says, I want to know the most paranoid security measures you've implemented in your homelab. I can think of SDN solutions with firewalls covering every interface, ACLs, locked-down/hardened OSes etc but not much beyond that. I'm wondering how deep this paranoia can go (and maybe even go down my own route too!).

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (15 children)

Only remote access by wireguard and ssh on non standard port with key based access.

Fail2ban bans after 1 attempt for a year. Tweaked the logs to ban on more strict patterns

Logs are encrypted and mailed off site daily

System updates over tor connecting to onion repos.

Nginx only has one exposed port 443 that is accessible by wireguard or lan. Certs are signed by letsencrypt. Paths are ip white listed to various lan or wireguard ips.

Only allow one program with sudo access requiring a password. Every other privelaged action requires switching to root user.

I dont allow devices I dont admin on the network so they go on their own subnet. This is guests phones and their windows laptops.

Linux only on the main network.

I also make sure to backup often.

[–] peter 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Linux only on the main network.

Is that a security benefit?

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

If big corporations hoovering your data should be on everyone's threat list, then yea, i'd say its a huge benefit.

[–] NOPper@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I guess it cuts the attack surface profile down a bit?

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well I dont trust closed source software and do what I can to avoid it when I can. At least foss can be audited. Also all the linux devices on the main network are devices I admin.

load more comments (11 replies)