this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
598 points (96.9% liked)

News

23413 readers
2812 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said Monday she feels daily “frustration” as conservative justices move the country to the ideological right.

In an appearance at the University of California, Berkely School of Law, Sotomayor was asked how she copes with the consistently conservative rulings from the court.

“Every loss truly traumatizes me,” but “I get up the next morning,” she said in response to the question, The San Francisco Chronicle reported. The crowd — about 1,300 students — applauded.

In her remarks, she criticized her “originalist colleagues” whom she said have come up with “new ways to interpret the Constitution,” changing rulings “that some of us believed were well established,” the Chronicle reported.

The 6-3 conservative court has had an eventful couple of terms, making its mark on some of the most consequential aspects of everyday life — from overturning the federal right to an abortion to ruling affirmative action in colleges unconstitutional.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hark@lemmy.world 147 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Expand the court. "But republicans will do the same" you might say. To that I say "okay, let the court be a million judges to show just how shitty and ridiculous it is, let it collapse under its own stupidity. Besides, the conservatives already control the court, so there's really nothing to lose."

[–] scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org 53 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Make every US citizen a justice upon turning the minimum age for a Supreme Court justice.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Upon learning this in High School I was baffelled... There are no requirements to being a Supreme Court justice in the constitution. Simply that you are appointed by the president, and Congress confirms you. You don't need a background in law at all. There is no age requirement at all. There aren't even citizenship requirements. By the Constitution, Biden could appoint Gretta Thornburg to the Supreme Court, and Congress could confirm her, and we would have Justice Thornburg for the next 70-odd years.

https://www.findingalawyer.org/supreme-court-justice-qualifications/

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

My favored tactic is to -- Bam! Expand the court to 11 in one year, than 13 in two. Nuke the filibuster if you have to.

Then Democrats can sit down with Republicans and say "You can let us appoint 4 justices to lifetime terms and wait until you get the Presidency and both houses of Congress to expand it more, or you can work with us to pass an amendment to set up term limits and other reforms so the SC is no longer a political football".

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

The main issue is confirmations. If enough Republicans hold the Senate, they can stall confirmation until their guy comes into office and then stuff the court further.

[–] maness300@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Just ignore what they say if you don't like it.

If enough people do this, they won't have any power. They literally cannot arrest us all.

Look at what we did with marijuana.

That said, this really only applies to states' rights. California can disobey the supreme court without repercussion. Women can't disobey abortion bans in their states unless the vast majority of them band together.

The problem with that is, if the vast majority of them banded together then they could remove the bans in the first place.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

What was it that "we did with marijuana"? Because there are a shit load of people in prison that would be happy to know that the problem has been fixed.

Edit: lol at this being controversial. Just to clarify: we haven't fixed shit with respect to cannabis. We've barely put a band-aid on the problem. Yes I'm glad some states have explicitly gone against federal law, but you're ignorant as fuck if you think we fixed the problem in any way.

[–] maness300@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Marijuana is still illegal federally but states just ignore it.

I'm downvoting you because this legitimately should not have to be said.

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There are also a shit load of people who aren't in there anymore because of what we did. Was it a complete solution? No, but with Republicans around nothing ever is.