this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
151 points (90.4% liked)

Privacy

32169 readers
502 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The company added that it does not "listen to any conversations or have access to anything beyond a third-party aggregated, anonymized and fully encrypted data set that can be used for ad placement" and "regret[s] any confusion."

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/12/no-a-marketing-firm-isnt-tapping-your-device-to-hear-private-conversations/

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20231214235444/https://www.cmglocalsolutions.com/blog/active-listening-an-overview

Is Active Listening Legal?

We know what you’re thinking. Is this even legal? The short answer is: yes. It is legal for phones and devices to listen to you. When a new app download or update prompts consumers with a multi-page terms of use agreement somewhere in the fine print, Active Listening is often included.

So what were you saying?

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Did you read the article? No, you did not.

According to the company this is all from regular 3rd party stuff. Being legal or not is beside the point when you are not actually doing something.

You're argument is based on what a marketing company put in their marketing.

Read the article, with clarifications from the company

ETA : if this were true I would either see it in my firewall logs, or it would blow through my data cap in a week. Surveillance capitalism is bullshit, this is just a grift.

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 3 points 11 months ago

Seems funny how you keep saying from the company as if somehow asking s murderer with red bloody hands if they did it is somehow a creditable source

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You’re argument is based on what a marketing company put in their marketing.

But your response is

with clarifications from the company

So what the company says isn't good enough... Except when it's in your favor? You realize that both statement are "from the company".

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fight as long as you want, when they were called out on it they backed off. The technical aspects of this are not trivial, nor is the amount of data needed as anyone who has had an Alexa or similar spyware in their house will tell you.

Like I said

if this were true I would either see it in my firewall logs, or it would blow through my data cap in a week.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 11 months ago

Like I said

if this were true I would either see it in my firewall logs, or it would blow through my data cap in a week.

Audio is literally trivial amounts of bandwidth. You wouldn't notice it at all. Using something like Opus, you could stream audio 24/7 and reach about 300MBs uploaded. Now do some basic trimming/word processing... That number can easily be less than 10MB a day.