this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
526 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2968 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Banning specific guns is pure theater, even if it passes. There's zero real safety in it.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Speaking on behalf of the rest of us, we think it would be cool if we tried to see if it would go differently before we just accept the opinion of random people on the internet with zero proven credentials to weigh in on the subject.

If that’s okay with you.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

America had an assault weapon ban previously and during that time is when school shootings actually started.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You mean this?

Could you tell us exactly what shooting you believe “started” them all? Because according to the article, lives were saved ass a result of the ban.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Columbine was the start of the modern school shooting phenomenon. To this date mass shooters, even outside of school settings, follow the blueprint they started in the 1999 assualt of a school. The tactics, motivation, and planning for Columbine seperates it from more than most of the previous civilian gun violence, and the mass shooters that follow look more like the Columbine shooters than they look like the shooters who came before them.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Really? Prove it. You're statement is full of hot air. Pure posturing.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is that why there are very few shootings in other developed countries where gun control is also infinitely stricter?

[–] Deftdrummer@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Like Mexico where the schools have been hardened since the 80s and there are millions of guns and criminals?

Try again. The "Western nation" schtick is incorrect and getting stale.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

other developed countries

Try again.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

Ah yes, the famously developed and first world country of Mexico!

It's not like Mexico is stuck in development hell thanks in large part to it's larger northern neighbor exercising their significantly larger influence upon them or anything

You're so insecure about shit that's bad about the US, it's kinda pathetic to see you on every comment thread poorly defending the US