this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
34 points (94.7% liked)

UK Politics

3110 readers
86 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] guriinii@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good. I hope more follow. Those who voted against... I feel sick thinking about these people.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, resigning over something we can do nothing about.

That'll show 'em.

[–] mannycalavera 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's true that not the UK, not the EU, and sure was hell not even the US can stop what's unfolding on our screens physically.

But diplomacy is about sending signals and messages of which the message of a ceasefire from the UK House Of Commons is a very powerful one. Having a large number of MPs calling for a ceasefire is doing something.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hamas have no intention of abiding by a ceasefire, so calling for one is essentially saying that Hamas can attack Israel all they like but Israel can't fight back.

[–] Mrkawfee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Israel has slaughtered 5000 kids and dropped the equivalent of two Hiroshima nukes on the most densely populated strip of land on earth. They've "fought" back plenty.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While Hamas exists, there will always be a threat to Israel.

Also, it's funny how no one blames Hamas for using Palestinians as human shields. It's always "why would the Israelis do this?" "The Israelis must stop" "Israel is a fascist state" blah blah blah.

Israel literally drops flyers into areas where they're going to bomb, to let civilians escape. Hamas tells those people to stay, because it's in the interests of Hamas for more civilians to die.

[–] kralk@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry but this is some "stop hitting yourself" bullshit. It's illegal to bomb hospitals. Nobody is forcing Israel to do that. They are deliberately choosing to do that.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It's not illegal to bomb hospitals if they're being used for military purposes.

That applies to any building. It makes it a legitimate target.

[–] cook_pass_babtridge 3 points 1 year ago

At some point you've got to balance the interests of destroying your enemies and trying to minimise civilian casualties. Israel is only doing the former. Even if they destroy Hamas, their actions will cause more people to take up arms against them. Remember that 20-year-long war on terror we just finished? Didn't work, did it?

[–] Mrkawfee 2 points 1 year ago

You're just repeating Israeli talking points. Hamas is a product of Israel's brutal occupation of Palestinian land. There will always be resistance to that occupation just as Israels war against the PLO in the 1980s did not end Palestinian resistance. There is no military solution to Israeli apartheid of 5 million people.

[–] Blackmist 4 points 1 year ago

Minority group, in an opposition party, in a country that has no say, over a conflict that has no real effect on us.

[–] cook_pass_babtridge 2 points 1 year ago

If it doesn't affect anything, why didn't Starmer give a free vote?