this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
417 points (91.6% liked)

Technology

59568 readers
3916 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re asking for proof they contributed before an arbitrary date. Can you provide a list of everyone other than Apple who contributed before 2012?

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We can look at the press release announcing USBC from 2013 where Apple isn't mentioned at all... https://studylib.net/doc/18619173/usb-type-c-press-release-from-2013

It looks like they were mentioned in a 2014 list however https://www.docdroid.net/uf3z/typec-pdf

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those are two completely different lists. One is “the promoter group” and the other is “everyone involved” which are in no way equivalent. It’s like the opening credits on a movie, vs the closing credits. One of the two is inherently going to be more detailed.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's true, but if Apple was heavily invested at the time, you'd think they'd show up in the "opening credits" :p

[–] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really my point was just that Apple designed the lightning connector instead of working collaboratively toward a USBc-like standard

[–] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

They did work collaboratively towards a standard. They just also in parallel worked on their own project, because they know standards can take an indefinite amount of time, so it could have been a decade to get USB C fleshed out, while they had already been working on Lightning in the background.