United Kingdom

4113 readers

327 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom

GreatAlbatross

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

BMW, Subaru and Porsche drivers ‘more likely to cause a crash’, study finds (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by C4d@lemmy.world to c/unitedkingdom

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So it’s not purely anecdotal then… link to the original paper is here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rogue 1 points 1 year ago

I did read the article. The context of the statement you've picked out is as follows

Dodgy driving – covering such reported infringements as speeding, jumping a red light, overtaking on double white lines or ignoring the humble pedestrian crossing – was more likely to be a factor when a Subaru, Porsche and BMW was involved than a Skoda or Hyundai.

The authors have hand picked these items but they don't say that these behaviours are exclusively what's defined as risky or aggressive behaviour.

I agree with your statement:

Anyone who overtakes on a double centreline is an utter twat and well deserves to be called dangerous.

I'm not sure if you thought I was implying otherwise?