UK Politics

3100 readers

150 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom

GreatAlbatross

flamingos

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

‘Proportional representation will lead to better politics’, Labour conference told (leftfootforward.org)

submitted 1 year ago by Syldon to c/uk_politics

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The only justification for not doing this is protectionism. Starmer is placing party above country. We can see how damaging the Tories are. I do not want to see their likes again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HumanPenguin 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Given the comment I replyed to.

I think lack of local MPs is a legitimate criticism of pure PR.

I have no idea why you would think it was. I was arguing local representation dose not really exist in FPTP as it is envissanged,

[–] jabjoe 1 points 1 year ago

I'm arguing that local MPs are worth having, but FPTP is unrepresentative. With MMPR you get the best of both worlds.