this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
142 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3110 readers
205 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rishi Sunak refused to properly fund a school rebuilding programme when he was chancellor, despite officials presenting evidence that there was “a critical risk to life” from crumbling concrete panels, the Department for Education’s former head civil servant has said.

After the department told Sunak’s Treasury that there was a need to rebuild 300 to 400 schools a year in England, he gave funding for only 100, which was then halved to 50, said Jonathan Slater, the permanent secretary of the department from 2016 to 2020.

Conservative ministers more widely believed a greater funding priority was to build new free schools, Slater told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday, as pupils returned to many schools in England for the new term.

“For me as an official, it seemed that should have been second to safety,” Slater said. “But politics is about choices. And that was a choice they made.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mannycalavera 7 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Given the civil service is as leaky as a sieve why is he only just timing this announcement now? 🤔

The former Head Civil Servant had safety concerns but thought keeping it quiet was the correct thing to do? He could have easily leaked this on the basis of safety. It's not like literally every other thing was leaked during that time.

This doesn't excuse Sunak by the way.

[–] Mrkawfee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe because no one cared about it until the media picked up on the story?

[–] mannycalavera 4 points 1 year ago

"For me as an official, it seemed that should have been second to safety" Slater said. "But politics is about choices. And that was a choice they made."

Fair enough. Although it sounds like he was deeply concerned about safety.... just not enough to raise anything to the press at the time and only now.

load more comments (6 replies)