this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
125 points (85.3% liked)

GenZedong

4298 readers
102 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (15 children)
  1. no
  2. no
  3. no
  4. no
  5. no
  6. maybe
  7. no
  8. they would nuke the world into the stone age before that happened
[–] kig_v2@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think you are greatly overestimating the failing and floundering West. The unipolar American hegemony lasted 30 years and its been seriously challenged for less than 5 years and already severe cracks are showing. Country by country is breaking free from Western imperialism or openly switching sides. Things that were imagined as impossible in the jurisdiction of the wrathful Empire have been done again and again in these past ~5 years. These trends reinforce themselves exponentially; as the Empire loses its grip, it has even less means to imperialize and sustain itself, thus losing the means to fund its military dominance, and so on.

I agree that the nuclear arsenal of the US is a little worrisome, especially if and when our federal gov't decays to the point that it is vulnerable to theft by fascist paramilitaries--I see this as the most likely reason for an invasion of the U.S. by the East. But even then, said Nazis would have no means of launching said weapons or even keeping up with their maintenance, let alone the rest of the world which will have technologically lapped them by then.

The only variable that remains unclear, to me at least, is A.I. But using what we know with the rules of life we are accostomed to, it is not at all a personal opinion for me to say that most if not all of these goals being accomplished by 2050 (or even sooner!) is far more likely than not.

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Two points about AI from a very much non-expert (me):

  1. Current western attempts look impressive but are a bit shit and are probably doomed to fail for as long as they can't filter out liberalism and memes. It's going to be contradictions of capitalism and it's ideology on a speedrun.
  2. China has the data of up to 1.4 or more billion people all under one roof. And as they're Marxists, they can ensure that the developed AI better correlates to reality and it's used productively rather than to cheat on tests (that's going to end up badly) and to sack employees because the computer (incorrectly) said so.

Which is to say the west is doubly fucked and AI won't save it.

[–] Jusog@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Hm, i'm no expert on AI either, but I also don't think it could save the west. Nothing can save the west, it's either socialism or barbarism. Either we start controlling ourselves and stop exploiting literall everything, or we keep digging our own graves.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)