this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
959 points (93.3% liked)

World News

32375 readers
703 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 152 points 1 year ago (5 children)

But fuck it, let's all just return to the office anyways. Amirite? SMH

[–] Misconduct@startrek.website 77 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well yeah. If we don't the landowners will lose money on all their ugly and useless office buildings and that would be sooo awful :(

[–] like47ninjas@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But if they lose money they can't invest it and create jobs.

[–] Dragster39@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, I forgot, the wonderful trickle-down-economics. /s

Give the rich more and we will all benefit from it some day instead of creating social security and subsidizing education by fairly taxing everyone equally and without exceptions and loopholes.

[–] like47ninjas@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

My comment was 10,000% sarcasm. Of course they don't add jobs, trickledown economics is a complete crock of shit lol

[–] June@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder how much of the wave is due to return to office

[–] shitescalates@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How many people haven't returned? My company, and nearly everyone I know has been back for 2 years.

[–] dana@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My company only started cracking down on it a couple months ago. Nominally the majority of employees were supposed to be working in the office three days a week as of April 2022, but most of the roles don't require physical presence so people just kept working from home. Now the company has shifted to tracking badge data to make sure people are actually coming into the office, despite three years of data demonstrating we're just as productive as home...

[–] DBVegas@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

My company is just doing the big return to work push now, the turnover that they're gonna get hit with is hilarious. They have no idea how mad everyone is about it.

[–] First@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here in Norway there was a marked shift to acceptance for more home office post-Corona. We did have stricter and longer restrictions than you guys though, and basically things didn't go back to normal until winter 2022. At my work I'd say 80% do home office at least 1 day per week, and 30% do home office 4/5 days in the week (we have one mandatory office day per week). I'd also say that a few percent have taken that opportunity to do "quiet quitting" and essentially do nothing (joining meetings from the car in the middle of the day on their way to IKEA and stuff like that, never engaging in or starting initiatives by themselves etc.), but that's on management for not getting rid of them.

Personally I still go 5/5 days by own choice, because I live right next by, prefer the ritual of switching into job/focus mode that it is to walk to the office, and like sitting in a separate place that has no distractions (compared to home, where I would take 5 minutes to do the dishes, take an extended trip to the grocery at lunch, etc) and that my brain only associates with working.

[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In the UK at least, most people I know who work in an office can choose to WFH or do hybrid working. I do hybrid by choice, I don't want to WFH full time.

[–] user_already_exists@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just in time with school starting back up too for kids. A lot have already gone back, hence where I think the spike patterns originate.

[–] arbitrary@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Not sure about other countries, but at least in Europe we had quite a few comments, including by health officials, that the school closures should not have been done and upheld to the extent that they were.

And I agree, the impact on learning and children's mental health was not justified by the real or potential dangers of the pandemic imho

Edit: One comment from the German Health Minister here, describing prolonged school closures as a mistake

[–] diffuselight@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile in Asia we moved lessons to zoom for a few weeks and that was it. But Germans think giving kids a tablet or notebook is exposing them to the devil

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, saying that schools shouldn’t have been closed is just silly and shows the ridiculousness of those people. Germany handled Covid not so well and still hasn’t so it should just be ignored

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

In many places schools weren't even really 'closed'. The number of failures stacked on top of failures is staggering. Nobody who matters will be held to account. Most westerners won't want to accept it but China's response was near flawless in comparison. And their economy continued to grow throughout. Albeit at a lesser rate. The west plunged itself into recession which it then reframed it's way out of and still hasn't recovered properly.

[–] arbitrary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't say that. They said the extent of closures was inappropriate for the severity of the pandemic and the role of schools.

And Germany did quite well during COVID, per capita deaths are far lower than, for example, in the US, UK, Italy, or France.

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All of those countries failed horrendously and are very low standards. Schools obviously were t, and aren’t, closed enough with the amount of death

[–] arbitrary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, comparing countries with it's peers is what you should do. I could also have taken Argentina, Bulgaria, or Russia, but at the end you'll see that Germany did fairly well.

I think the question is somewhere how much death we accept against the impact of avoiding it. In this case, as I said before, there seems increasingly the opinion that school closures as a measure did not have the impact that justified its extent of use.

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would argue that we can’t look at that as the deaths were far too high regardless of closures. no Essentially, we don’t know how many deaths could have been avoided through thougher methods. Germany’s death rate was still far higher than it needed to be even if Europe as a whole also failed.

[–] arbitrary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like you only read half my comment each time.

You will always reach a point of diminishing marginal returns with measures taken, and you have to evaluate the impact of the measure against it's effectiveness.

The argument is that school closures likely did not contribute sufficiently to justify their extent of implementation, meaning you probably would have wanted a few more people dying to avoid the shortfalls in children's education and socialisation that you have now. The ends, in retrospective, arguably did not justify the means.

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, they did. The ends reduced the death rate and hence justified what was done.

[–] arbitrary@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are not reading my comments. The closures did not reduce deaths/infections by enough to justify having them, that is the argument.

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

And that argument is silly

[–] DBVegas@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

Lol for real, can't wait til I find a new WFH job. The brain drain that my "return to the office" job has on the way is going to be monumental. EVERYONE that doesn't have a direct report in my department is looking for a new job.