this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
1382 points (96.3% liked)

Murdered by Words

1556 readers
1 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1382
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SomeoneElse@lemmy.world to c/murderedbywords
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] subignition@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The original screenshot did not include the reply's likes at the bottom, which is kind of an important detail when the title is explicitly pointing out the ratioing.

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I see your point. But the title was taken from the top line of the screenshot. The fact that the reply got 400 more likes than the original doesn’t add anything to the murder… if anything the reply only getting 400 more likes detracts from it. But, I’ll update the post to include that info and delete the post from the user above you as it’s breaks the rules.

[–] subignition@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Eh, I agree somewhat. My understanding is that the point of ratioing is to demonstrate the weight of public opinion behind the response.

Full disclosure, I've only just noticed this is in a /murderedbywords, so that means the focus is on the insult and not the reception so it's probably fine, lol