this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
3 points (80.0% liked)

WetShaving

720 readers
9 users here now

This is a community of enthusiasts, hobbyists and artisans who enjoy a traditional wet shave: brush, soap, and safety or straight razor. We are a part of the WetShaving community found on Reddit, Discord, and IRC.

New subscribers welcome!

Please visit our wiki, which is always and forever a work in progress.

๐Ÿช’ Check out these alternative front-ends for this server:

https://gem.wetshaving.social/ - a nice modern interface

https://old.wetshaving.social/ - designed to look like old.reddit.com

Our sister Mastodon instance is https://wetshaving.social/.

๐Ÿช’ Track the uptime of our various services here:

https://uptime.splettnet.com/status/wetshaving

๐Ÿช’ Community Rules

Rule 1 - Behaviour and Etiquette
Rule 2 - Content Guidelines
Rule 3 - Reviews and Disclosure
Rule 4 - Advertising
Rule 5 - Inappropriate Content
Rule 10 - Moderator Discretion

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Share your shave of the day!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] gcgallant@sub.wetshaving.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I continue to enjoy this series. The DE razor (and blades) were marketed in parallel with SEs. Was the popularity of DEs all about low-cost replaceable blades?

[โ€“] djundjila@sub.wetshaving.social 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thank you! I enjoy writing it!

Was the popularity of DEs all about low-cost replaceable blades?

I don't know, and I wonder about it a lot. The GEM system seems technically better, and IMHO makes for better mass-produced razors than the Gillette format. Might it just be network effects?

[โ€“] gcgallant@sub.wetshaving.social 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My suspicion is that it was marketing. I think the band steel used for DE blades was a boon for blade production. The band steel seems to be a perfect fit for high volume, multi-stage manufacture. Gillette heavily promoted replaceable blades, and as I recall, the company's business model was to make its profits through high-volume/low margin sales of blades.

Marketing sounds plausible. The Doubledge Micromatic blades would have had the exact same arguments in their favour, yet they didn't stick around.

Maybe it's one of those mac vs windows stories. Two roughly equivalent systems and one of them gets big first.