hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:
we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.
we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).
an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.
aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:
- these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
- the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
- our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
- and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for
as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:
There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.
Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.
and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.
this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.
thanks for using our site folks.
Not a fan of this decision and will probably be parting ways with Beehaw tbh.
People have the choice to filter and handle their own timelines and there's local timeline already that can preserve the community mission. Splitting the community at this stage seems like a lazy decision - surely there has to be a better way to handle this especially with the amount of support people are throwing at the whole Lemmy thing.
There isn’t though. We can all agree better mod tools/user settings are sorely needed, and people are working on it, but it still takes time.
This doesn't change the fact that, even if people can do that and we have a local timeline, we'd still have a moderation workload to get through - for the past few days, we were getting slammed on that front, and that is part of why this decision was made. It's not something that was taken lightly or done on a whim.
There isn't - the way Lemmy's software is, the admins options are to (A) do nothing, or to (B) defederate. When that is fixed, when Lemmy has better tools for moderating and managing how federation works with Beehaw, that is, ideally we'll have a discussion about refederating then.
I get that you guys are entitled to your own form of moderation but I have no desire to invest time in creating content for free that I don't get to choose who gets to access.
If I'm going to contribute to the public internet I don't want someone else choosing who gets to see it based on their moderation work load. I already made a mistake of investing time and creating content on Reddit so it's time for something different.
If you participate in any federated community, you and the content you create will always be subject to whatever form of moderation they have. Even on other instances, admins and mods will still be making calls about who gets to see it based on any particular criteria that is important to them, and on Lemmy, you'll be able to see the impact of their discretion in their instance's
/modlog
or/instances
page. Regardless of that, you have every right to choose any instance which provides the kind of moderation that you want, or to self-host. In any case, I hope you find a community for you as everyone is deserving of.On our part, Beehaw up til now has been very clear about its moderation policies and its community philosophy (some of which is linked in our sidebar) especially regarding how decisions get made about bans, removals, defederation, etc. and what kind of test things are put to, with a lot of major admin decisions being pinned discussions for everyone to participate in. Everyone is entitled and empowered to do with all this information what they wish.
I don't really think moderation is going to be possible with the fediverse. Its lack of centralized power is literally it's entire thing
I agree that there will never be an “end state” where moderation can be complacent; communities will need to be dynamic and adjust to needs in real-time (which is what these admins are doing now, whether one agrees with the decision or not). To throw hands up and say moderation is futile would be oversimplifying the situation IMO.