this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
275 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3366 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Can someone explain why this is different from election interference?

You have people going away for years for stealing/destroying ballots, as they should.

But to throw away the result of millions of counted ballots seems like these low level interference x1000. How have they not faced dire consequences?

And yeah, I know, if its considered state level crimes (because states define tgeir own election rules), then it's local law enforcement, prosecutors, judges who look the other way because it's for their team.

But these seem to be major crimes with a clear record. How are they not locked away despite political alignment?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's not, but you have a DOJ that is afraid of doing anything that might look 'political'. We know enough that this whole scheme was coordinated from the very top, but they slow walked the whole thing so we're now in the situation where Trump could get elected again and make the whole thing go away.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Seeing as how people have already been indicted for this shit, knowing that this is potentially coming, I don't think they're going to have the same kid gloves on this time. And the orange stain isn't in power anymore. However we will see soon enough!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

It’s not, but you have a DOJ that is afraid of doing anything that might look ‘political’.

Which is itself political, and 100000000% corrupt.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I guess that's what I don't get. How can stealing/destroying ballots not be considered "political", but figuratively throwing out all of the ballots and unilaterally picking the winner be protected as "political".

It seems both are major crimes to democracy, whatever political party happened to commit said crimes.

Unless there's some grey area not explicitly addressed in law wrt electors.

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's like Democrats don't care if Trump committed crimes

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 3 points 3 weeks ago

Might be that they prefer doubling down on the pied piper strategy pioneered by Hillary.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They do, but the Democrats don’t enact justice. The DOJ does that, or is supposed to.

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 weeks ago

DOJ acts according to the President's priorities. Where was the party putting pressure on the Whitening House and insisting on justice being served? Should have been a top priority after Biden took office