this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
883 points (98.9% liked)

News

23367 readers
4414 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Puerto Ricans cannot vote in general elections despite being U.S. citizens, but they can exert a powerful influence with relatives on the mainland. Phones across the island of 3.2 million people were ringing minutes after the speaker derided the U.S. territory Sunday night, and they still buzzed Monday.

Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris is competing with Trump to win over Puerto Rican communities in Pennsylvania and other swing states. Shortly after stand-up comic Tony Hinchcliffe said that, “I don’t know if you guys know this, but there’s literally a floating island of garbage in the middle of the ocean right now. I think it’s called Puerto Rico,” Puerto Rican reggaeton superstar Bad Bunny announced he was backing Harris.

After Sunday’s rally, a senior adviser for the Trump campain, Danielle Alvarez, said in a statement that Hinchcliffe’s joke did “not reflect the views of President Trump or the campaign.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 217 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Why the fuck are US citizens not allowed to vote in a US election?

[–] TRBoom@lemm.ee 175 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Because each state is given the power to elect a president, not the voters. Puerto Rico isn’t a state so their voters aren’t represented properly.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 73 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

i mean the technicallity is that washington dc isnt a state either, so the better answer is that you need to live in a region where you have representatives.

[–] zombyreagan@lemm.ee 65 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Dc does not have voting representatives in congress. They only get electoral votes because of the 23rd ammendment

[–] grue@lemmy.world 63 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The better question is "why didn't the 23^rd^ grant voting rights to all US citizens in all territories?"

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 92 points 3 weeks ago

gonna be honest with you, its racism.

[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Because of slavery, basically. The US couldn't have a directly-elected president at founding because that would mean slaveholding states would get less power per person actually living there, unless they wanted to let slaves vote which of course they wouldn't. So 3/5ths compromise, electoral college, yadda yadda yadda, and 250 years later power still is filtered through the states. So now that that's the case, giving any new people voting rights would change the power balance between the ~~slaveholders~~ right and ~~abolitionists~~ left. So as a result, places like PR that have an abnormal amount of ~~minorities~~ Democratic voters tend to be unable to get Congress to grant them voting rights.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

but the context of the news report is about the president, which they can vote for.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Also because DC and PR would most likely vote democrats it makes it harder. Most of the time when a state joined the union there was a fight.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

What happened to “no taxation without representation”..?

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Never existed in the US. Women, slaves, prisoners, permanent residents, etc... It's always been in the hands of the rich. They just pretend to listen to the people. But as Trump has many times noted, the vote doesn't matter. The state can send delegates with any instructions they want and the federal government can decide state delegates are not valid and exclude them. Most states have laws to follow the vote, but it's not the federal government's job to enforce those laws if they chose not to follow them. That would be for the people of that state to fight later.

Ask some of the 14-17 year olds working their first jobs paying tax without the ability to vote. That was never a real concern for anyone outside landowning whites.

[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Lots of people move to Puerto Rico for tax purposes.

[–] raef@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Easy, they don't pay federal taxes

[–] Verat@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

While they dont pay income taxes to the IRS, they do pay customs taxes, federal commodity taxes, and federal payroll taxes (Social Security, Medicare, and Unemployment) to the IRS, which sounds alot like federal taxes to me.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

What a shit system

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 78 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

the electoral college values different things than the will of the populace

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which was actually supposed to prevent Trump, but the founding fathers couldn't have predicted the modern world.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 35 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, they did. It was referred to by the Framers as a "Living Document" and they intended us to re-write it as we grew as a nation:

"The question Whether one generation of men has a right to bind another, seems never to have been started either on this or our side of the water… (But) between society and society, or generation and generation there is no municipal obligation, no umpire but the law of nature. We seem not to have perceived that, by the law of nature, one generation is to another as one independant nation to another…

On similar ground it may be proved that no society can make a perpetual constitution, or even a perpetual law. The earth belongs always to the living generation…

Every constitution, then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of 19. years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force and not of right."

-Tommy J.

[–] zigmus64@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago

The Dixie-crats.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

This message was brought to you by Brando.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

History tells me that if the US is disenfranchising a group of people, it's usually racism

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-10-02-0065

There was one difficulty however of a serious nature attending an immediate choice by the people. The right of suffrage was much more diffusive in the Northern than the Southern States; and the latter could have no influence in the election on the score of the Negroes. The substitution of electors obviated this difficulty and seemed on the whole to be liable to fewest objections.

The problem with the south, is that everything they do looks like it's all about racism, but they actually use their virulent and brutal racism to cover more evil selfishness. They're just monstrously racist as a hobby, corruption is their true passion.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago

one more reason why the popular vote would be better than the shitshow this is

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Puerto Rico is a protectorate and has its own government. Puerto Ricans can't vote while on the island, but can vote in the US

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Every US State has its own government, too. I don't see that as an excuse.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The Constitution says that each state shall send electors to the electoral college. So Puerto Rico's status as an unorganized territory is a bit of a blocker.

The District of Columbia is also not a part of any state, as specified in the Constitution. However, DC explicitly got some electors in the 23rd amendment, so they can vote for President.

Really, the idea that the United States might have overseas territories that are not on track to statehood is itself an invention of the twentieth century. (Owing to the 1898 Spanish-American war, which caused the US to take over several parts of the ex-Spanish empire).

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, I understand that that's the reason, but a reason is not the same thing as an excuse.