this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
1045 points (78.5% liked)

Political Memes

5483 readers
3094 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 1 month ago (33 children)
[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least some, like Ralph Nader, regretted it. Now we have those actively seeking to spoil the vote.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The tragic thing about Nader was his activism basically proved to General Motors and later large American corporations in general that political engagement and and public opinion was vital. The corpos learned to fight grass roots activism with astro-turf until they were just as skilled as Nader's acolytes, only with orders of magnitude more resources.

Every time I see an Oil company do a commercial about their commitment to the environment I think of Ralph.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

Similarly, Woodward and Bernstein showed the corporations how dangerous an independent press was.

Back in Watergate Era, there were plenty of locally owned newspapers and TV stations. Today, thanks to ronald reagan's assault on the Fairness Doctrine, we have six major media companies controlling what we hear.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What does third parties have to do with lifelong Dem voters wanting the Dem candidate to side with the Dem voting base on basic parts of the party platform like:

  1. No fracking

  2. Better healthcare

  3. Climate change is real and producing less fossil fuels is a good thing

What you're doing is insisting if you're not 100% loyal to the candidate with a D by their name you really have an R.

That's the same fucking shit Republicans went thru and it ended up with trump.

Why the fuck do you want to follow down the path of "never criticize the party, and always vote for them".

Please explain to the class why this time it will work out good for the party that takes that path.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 14 points 1 month ago (27 children)

It's not that it will work out good (though in a sense, it has for the R in that they got what they actually wanted), it's that if the Rs have ~50% ish support, no matter what they do, because of them going that route, the only way to beat them is to get everyone that isn't them in a coalition together.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is that the broader Democratic electorate is a much bigger tent, with overall much more moderate politics, than online leftists are typically willing to admit. We're still only eight years past an election where Hillary Clinton took the Rust Belt for granted, and we all paid the price for that when traditionally solid union votes swung to Trump because he was boosting fossil fuel extraction while Clinton implicitly threatened the livelihoods of families dependent on coal and fracking jobs.

Healthcare you have a point on, but also keep in mind that the last time Dems had the votes for sort of sweeping reform was 2008, and what we got out of that was the ACA, which for all its faults was still a big step up over the status quo. Obama was going for a big bipartisan win, in spite of McConnell's announcing that he was killing bipartisanship in the GOP caucus, and that was a mistake, but perhaps an understandable one given that up to that point that's how Congress had always worked.

There have been windows of time since in which Dems have held the Presidency and both houses of Congress, but never with enough margin to defeat a Senate filibuster, and with DINOs like Manchin and Sinema standing in the way of filibuster reform. I do not doubt that progressives in Congress would move an M4A or public option bill through the legislature if, in 2025, the House flips back and the Senate stays Democratic in spite of the unfavorable cycle, but withholding your vote doesn't get you any closer to that happening.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The problem is that the broader Democratic electorate is a much bigger tent, with overall much more moderate politics, than online leftists are typically willing to admit

Polls show progressive policy isn't just popular with Dems, but all voters...

That's life mate, I'm sorry it doesn't agree with your opinions, but it's the truth.

That's why Obama's 08 campaign did so fucking well, despite not really being that progressive in any other developed country.

The neoliberal experiment has only benefited the wealthy, stop defending them, they got lawyers and lobbyists for them, pick people over corps and we can get something done.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Polls show progressive policy isn't just popular with Dems, but all voters...

That is until they're told it's a Dem policy.

And of course the progressives actually show up to vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Except Biden repeatedly gave in to pressure from his voter base on a lot of actions, we also got a lot of changes to DNC policy care of Sanders voter base. It's not ''do or die'' it's vote for an administration that will actually respond to pressure and voter's policy goals, or vote for a dictator backed by industralists who all want an ethnostate of uneducated second class citizens.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Except Biden repeatedly gave in to pressure from his voter base on a lot of actions, we also got a lot of changes to DNC policy care of Sanders voter base.

And Biden got elected despite his age...

2020 was an example of the candidate moving their campaign left and winning the election.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What's your alternative, Trump? Because a 3rd party candidate will never win the general election without a massive overhaul of our election system which will never happen as long as the Rs have a majority in any branch of the government.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't disagree with the reality of what you're saying, and I personally agree, but at the same time I think you have to grant people the right to vote their opinion if that's what they choose. It's not my choice, but people should be able to represent their views how they want.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

Bad faith: "I want her to stop sending weapons to the country doing genocide."

Good faith: "So basically you're demanding that she solves the entire conflict immediately."

load more comments (30 replies)