this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
321 points (98.8% liked)

World News

32503 readers
659 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 34 points 2 months ago (3 children)

There won't be an exchange; only Israel has nukes; it'll just be genocide in a different location

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

more than a few actors may (likely?) have very low yield devices. only takes a few to panic people and governments into stupid actions.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons but they do have a nuclear program and it's very easy to go from there to nukes. Correct me if I'm wrong but AFAIK the principle behind nukes is pretty simple and it's modern geopolitics that makes them hard to get.

[–] Ageroth@reddthat.com 4 points 2 months ago

Simple and easy are not the same thing. Sure, enriching uranium is simple, you just centrifuge it so that the heavier, less stable isotopes separate from the bulk. Simple.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zippe-type_centrifuge

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

I think the concern is that some group will launch a dirty bomb at Israel, Israel will retaliate with nukes, and then the best case scenario is 'only' thousands dying. Oh, and did I mention that a dirty bomb can make a pretty large area uninhabitable for decades?