Games

16838 readers

1193 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

736

GOG: When we said we let you ‘own’ your games, we meant that no matter what happens you’ll still be able to play them thanks to our offline installers. (x.com)

submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

98 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In the legal sense that having DRM-free software does not mean that you're legally entitled to use it, sure.

But checking for a license before running is literally the entire definition of what DRM is. They aren't "bypassing" anything. They didn't create technology. They simply refused to allow software that has any type of license check (DRM).

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Never said they created a technology. Sorry you didnt like my choice of words.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

They didn't create anything of any type. They just declined games that didn't follow their rules.