this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3098 readers
90 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emperor 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

But the Independent Workers’ union of Great Britain (IWGB), says their members have been overlooked.

It represents some gig economy workers, such as Uber and Deliveroo drivers, who aren't explicitly mentioned in the new bill.

Because they are seen as self-employed, they aren't entitled to benefits such as holiday and sick pay.

General secretary Henry Chango Lopez says this makes them "some of the most precarious and exploited in society, lacking the most basic rights and remaining unsupported by legislation".

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) estimates more than 4m people in England and Wales work in the gig economy.

So it's been carefully worded to include the 1m people on zero hours contracts but not the 4m in the gig economy, although I can't figure out there's much of a difference.

[–] flamingos 5 points 4 months ago

Labour had a separate commitment to redefining the categories of self-employed and employee in their "New Deal for Workers".

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Well at least it helps a lot of people.

[–] HumanPenguin 2 points 4 months ago

That carefully wording amounts to.

"Employee"

Its more a lack of extra rules for contract then an employment rule.

The gov has plans to address both. In other laws. But I expect it to amount to a restriction on when a workers can be considered self employed rather then an employee.

Takes a bit more planning then the zero hour contract thing.