this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)
SneerClub
989 readers
2 users here now
Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.
AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)
This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.
[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Of course no proprietary data at all could ever permeate through the sampling of LLM creators, well known for scrupulously following all licensing terms, and thoroughly checking that scrapped data might not be accidentally licensed.
-_____________________________________________________________________________-
The premise that a standardized test could truly measure originality or creative thinking seems dubious to me in the first place. Just because a response is common amongst humans does not suggest to me that it is uncreative or even unoriginal (strictly speaking as long as you come up with it independently it is still both).
That being said I am curious as how a Text Based Machine could have completed these portions of the test:
Until I see the methodology, I am not even sure I buy the result as advertised.