this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
845 points (89.0% liked)

Fuck Subscriptions

3675 readers
1 users here now

Naming and shaming all "recurring spending models" where a one-time fee (or none at all) would be appropriate and logical.

Expect use of strong language.

Follow the basic rules of lemmy.world and common sense, and try to have fun if possible.

No flamewars or attacking other users, unless they're spineless corporate shills.

Note that not all subscriptions are awful. Supporting your favorite ~~camgirl~~ creator or Lemmy server on Patreon is fine. An airbag with subscription is irl Idiocracy-level dystopian bullshit.

New community rule: Shilling for cunty corporations, their subscriptions and other anti-customer practices may result in a 1-day ban. It's so you can think about what it's like when someone can randomly decide what you can and can't use, based on some arbitrary rules. Oh what, you didn't read this fine print? You should read what you're agreeing to.

==========

Some other groovy communities for those who wish to own their products, their data and their life:

Right to Repair/Ownership

Hedges Development

Privacy

Privacy Guides

DeGoogle Yourself

F-Droid

Stallman Was Right

Some other useful links:

FreeMediaHeckYeah

Louis Rossman's YouTube channel

Look at content hosted at Big Tech without most of the nonsense:

Piped

Invidious

Nitter

Teddit

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I didn't even know they did that, Glad I don't have an account with them. I'm partially deaf, most music I can't understand what someone singing. Those fun things people do of like "most common misheard lyrics" is basically my life. On the plus side I enjoy music from around the world because unintelligible music is unintelligible no matter where it's from. They're very few artists I feel like I can understand, and realistically I'm probably wrong.

In real life, I read lips to help augment my terrible hearing. Fun fact during the mask man dates during COVID, was probably the worst time for me. A lot of people I could hear talking as I could hear noise but I could not make out what it was. Leading to a lot of awkward conversations.

Anyhoo, that's all to say that for music that I do like I do have to see the lyrics. It's what converts the noise into words.

So, fuck you Spotify, My life's difficult enough already, I'm not paying your shitty service so you can charge me for my impairment.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

most music I can’t understand what someone singing

Just like the rest of us, tbh.

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Wit-ta burrdsahl sheardis-a loooooneleeeevieuuuuuuuuuuaaaand

-Red Hot Chilli Peppers

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With the birds I share this lonely view?

[–] littlecolt@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Should have used Pearl Jam as the example.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdOtR2A5agc

– How rap sounds to non-English speakers

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Everyone is going on about this as anti disability, but why does a disability entitle you to a service that's paid?

Unpaid Spotify sucks, full stop, no matter what part of you works or doesn't.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I would say, it because the lyrics aren't something Spotify made. No one's picking up Spotify because only Spotify has lyrics. Spotify isn't writing the songs. Regardless of what someone might think of Spotify or Spotify free, it's withholding something that they have that they didn't make from people that perhaps need it. It'd be like if broadcast TV or any on demand video service (YouTube, Disney, Netflix, etc.), said hey you didn't pay no more closed captions for you (where a free version is applicable, of course).

If Spotify wants to put stuff behind a paywall it can be features of the platform.

My personal opinion is Spotify sucks, full stop. The CEO is a real piece of work. This just goes on the pile of reason Spotify sucks.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

but why does a disability entitle you to a service that’s paid?

why would you limit the ability to use lyrics though? It's the same shit that every big article tabloid is doing "pay us five dollar a month and we will show you our articles, that we think are good" after showing you like three, in four months for free.

Either give people access to the service, or don't, don't play the bullshit of "well actually, here's a free sample"

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Same reason any tech company limit the ability to do anything - bandwidth, ownership etc.

Even if 'lyrics' are free, they still need to be written and proof read. You're either going to have to pay other companies to provide you the lyrics or pay your staff to write them down.

There's so many levels to this, Spotify still sucks, but you have to look at it realistically .

yeah but that still begs the question of why even give limited access. Just put it behind the paywall, it's not like people don't understand what spotify is, and it gives them a better excuse for selling a service anyway.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They're lyrics, intentionally making the service worse for people with hearing disabilities is ableist.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Isn't the entire world ableist?