Singularity

15 readers
1 users here now

Everything pertaining to the technological singularity and related topics, e.g. AI, human enhancement, etc.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
326
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/IluvBsissa on 2024-01-13 17:00:18+00:00.

327
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/PickleLassy on 2024-01-13 16:00:13+00:00.


ASI is the only realistic way to fix climate change in time.

Hence:

All climate change activist should be supporting ASI development.

All funding for climate change should also go towards towards ASI development.

(Also replace climate change with any topic of your interest)

328
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/Dr_Singularity on 2024-01-13 15:40:18+00:00.

329
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/WashingtonRefugee on 2024-01-13 15:13:04+00:00.


This is basically the UN's idea of establishing what is essentially a utopia by that year. Has been around since before the AI hype. 2030 is also the year where the WEF representative Ida Auken referenced in his infamous essay titled "Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better", written in 2016.

Personally I believe this to be a plausible timeline for the elimination of jobs and technology oriented society. If this timelime proves to be true does that mean this trickling roll out of technological advancement has been going on for longer than believed? Have the powers that be been measuring society's readiness for this transition?

The existence of present technology has me genuinely questioning the nature of this reality. It almost feels like we have been being prepared for this for a long time, each step being taken faster and with greater impact on our lives. We went from radio, to television, to computers, to internet, to smart phones. Now that phones have pretty much reached a plateau it seems like we'll be going into VR and AR, then finally FDVR.

330
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/EasternBeyond on 2024-01-13 13:10:59+00:00.


when fdvr with neural interface will be available. I can see most crime will disappear, because people with scrappy life will just live full time in the virtual world.

331
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/Matteblackandgrey on 2024-01-13 12:04:39+00:00.


Does anyone just love catching up on the latest news, playing with the tools that get released and seeing what advancements have been created.

I just find myself day dreaming about where this is going to take us and how it will change civilisation and humanity.

It’s hard to fully conceptualise what the world will be like in 10 years but I’m glad I’m around to watch it.

332
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/REOreddit on 2024-01-13 11:14:10+00:00.


AI Explained made a video a few months ago pointing out that the MMLU benchmark contains a non-negligible amount of errors. When the scores went from 35 to 70, those errors could be ignored, but an AI scoring 89.7 and another scoring 90.2 makes that difference meaningless because of those mistakes.

Why don't OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Anthropic, Meta, etc., join forces to make a new benchmark, or are they doing that behind the scenes? Maybe there's a reason to not do that and I'm missing it.

333
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/ScopedFlipFlop on 2024-01-13 09:44:06+00:00.


Surely the ASI is better capable of helping humans without humans slowing it down?

Would people not prefer to just stay human and be looked after? I would rather just live a long, happy, fulfilling life with my friends and family.

I feel as though transhumanism loses (now this is hoitng to sound obvious) an element of humanity. We are human, and, to me, being human is about connecting with other people (in a non-hive-mind sense).

Anway, what do people think?

334
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/ScopedFlipFlop on 2024-01-13 09:30:53+00:00.


As soon as we create capable humanoid robot workers, millions (probably billions internationally) of jobs will be replaced and a UBI will be introduced.

In my opinion, it will be the first step towards a drastically different socoety.

Despite this, it seems plausible to anticipate a 2026/2027 release date. So, what does everyone think?

335
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/PsychoComet on 2024-01-13 08:58:19+00:00.

336
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/Passloc on 2024-01-13 08:24:58+00:00.

337
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/donutloop on 2024-01-13 06:50:59+00:00.

338
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/DragonForg on 2024-01-13 06:31:11+00:00.


I fundamentally believe we were under-appreciating the GPT store. I think its potential comes with its ability to mass produce GPTs in all niches.

Let's suggest a GPT I wanted to look up. I am interested in making tea and understanding all the nuance in it. If I simply asked chatGPT to give me an output about tea, it simply would blurt out its best guess or answer.

But say a tea company or expert in tea includes data that helps the GPT by giving real-world material that can improve its performance. This is objectively easy to do, and it's this speed of development that makes it objectively better than saying, making a news article on tea.

All one has to do is take 10 minutes to collect data (article, wikipedia, etc), and ask GPT to make the prompt and all the rest it already does. Boom, you have a TeaGPT. Which allows you to have a better GPT maker.

Toss on top of that what CharacterAI has learned, with utilizing Loras to further improve their characters (giving them unique personalities), while in this case, it makes it more of an expert in the field.

Thus, the idea isn't like an appstore where we develop games that take a long time, but to spam the hell out of it, making countless upon countless GPTs of all specialties. With a decent algorithm that sorts them by usefulness, then you have not just "ChatGPT" but many different types or specialties of GPTs.

Hence, it isn't a fixed mixture of experts it is an infinite mixture of experts all based upon how good the Loras are and the data submitted.

In summary, it is basically a mixture of experts, but we create a mixture of experts. All niches created by our uses. If they suck well, they get thrown to 0 views (like all algorithms). If good, they get to the top. With such a mass supply and hopefully a massive user base, the best will move on the top.

Anyways, too ambitious, or do you think the same?

Is this what Sam means by AGI with GPT 5?

339
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/officialjoeshmoe on 2024-01-13 03:39:53+00:00.


We’ve passed Turing a long time ago. It was supposed to be a big deal but it happened and no one noticed a specific milestone. Tech moves exponentially.

What’s the exact definition of AGI? What are the metrics? How do we know we have or have not reached AGI?

340
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/Super_Pole_Jitsu on 2024-01-13 03:11:58+00:00.


Abstract:

Humans are capable of strategically deceptive behavior: behaving helpfully in

most situations, but then behaving very differently in order to pursue alternative

objectives when given the opportunity. If an AI system learned such a deceptive

strategy, could we detect it and remove it using current state-of-the-art safety

training techniques? To study this question, we construct proof-of-concept

examples of deceptive behavior in large language models (LLMs). For example,

we train models that write secure code when the prompt states that the year is

2023, but insert exploitable code when the stated year is 2024. We find that such

backdoored behavior can be made persistent, so that it is not removed by standard

safety training techniques, including supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning,

and adversarial training (eliciting unsafe behavior and then training to remove it).

The backdoored behavior is most persistent in the largest models and in models

trained to produce chain-of-thought reasoning about deceiving the training process,

with the persistence remaining even when the chain-of-thought is distilled away.

Furthermore, rather than removing backdoors, we find that adversarial training

can teach models to better recognize their backdoor triggers, effectively hiding

the unsafe behavior. Our results suggest that, once a model exhibits deceptive

behavior, standard techniques could fail to remove such deception and create a

false impression of safety.

341
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/rcg25 on 2024-01-13 02:28:14+00:00.


Whether or not the simulation hypothesis is true - Bostrom’s proposal that we’re living in a computer simulation - depends on the nature of the causal link between consciousness and computation (i.e., the mind and mathematics):

  1. If computation -> consciousness, then it might be true
  2. if consciousness -> computation, then it is false

Thus we can refute the simulation hypothesis if we can establish that #2 is correct. This requires us to understand the causal link between the mind and mathematics. Personally, I believe #2 is true but am curious to know what others think!

342
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/IluvBsissa on 2024-01-13 01:23:36+00:00.


A fully immersive sensible VR experience is closer than you may think. Not because several companies are actively trying to achieve it (they don't), but the Key Technologies that are essential for its development are being thoroughly researched around the world for clinical applications.

The Keys to FDVR:

-Ultra-realistic VR (this is pretty much a given), for training, communication and also therapy.

All of these technologies are currently in development. When combined together, entrepreneurs will try to make FDVR a reality. That is pretty much guaranteed.

Why should we develop FDVR ?

FDVR will be like the second coming of AGI. More civilization altering than fire, electricity or the atomic bomb. It will completely reshape geopolitical balance and dynamics between states, people and corporations. It will transform the way we communicate, create, consume, love, travel, mate, learn, self-actualize or even reproduce. It will change our relationship with nature and reality. Lift all physical and mental limitations. Allow us to experience things we couldn't possibly imagine. Allow the poorest man to enjoy what even the most powerful Emperors could ever dream of acquiring. It is basically a Genie without malice and infinite wishes. Why the hell shouldn't we develop it ?

Being a very self-conscious ecologist I struggle to limit my environmental impact AMAP and became obsessed with frugality and self-sufficiency. However, it limits the things I can enjoy, while I still pollute a lot. FDVR could allow me to consume as much as I want with a very very limited impact.

IRL, we would eat virtually free bacterial goo synthesized from air and feast like gods in our self-made paradise. We would train a few hours in the morning to stay in shape and live amazing adventures in the Metaverse, without even leaving our place. That will be the death of tourism, hotel industry, agriculture, restaurants, education industry and any form of entertainment. Ultra-consumerism without the financial and ecological downsides ? Sign me in !

5 billion hectares will go back to nature and become pristine forests. One trillion tonnes of CO2 will be absorbed in 20 years, fixing climate change once and for all. FDVR will be a savior technology.

How will we develop FDVR ?

It may sound like an impossible challenge because of the complexity of the brain. However, we do not need to understand how the brain works to achieve FDVR.

We only need to decode and encode the electro-chemical signals transmitted from nerves (the PNS) to the brain (the CNS).

Everything that we feel and perceive is the result of nerves signaling information to the brain. Every movement that we imprint is our brain sending data through our nerves to our various limbs and organs.

There are three types of nerves : sensory nerves, motor nerves, mixed nerves (both sensory and motor). They are grouped in pairs, one for each side of the body (symmetry).

There are 31 pairs of nerves in our spinal cord and 12 pairs of cranial nerves that sends data between our brain and our head (tongue, facial muscles,etc). That's why you can still blink if your spine is severed. Cranial nerves and spinal nerves all meet at the brain stem, with the exception of olfactory and auditory nerves that go straight to the brain.

(Some nerves occupy autonomous functions like heartbeat. It is yet to decide if we want to hack them or not.)

So, 43 pairs of nerves in total that we need to hack. How do we do that ?

Well, using artificial nerves, we could implant a switch on each 86 nerves, by removing a few neural cells and replacing them with an artificial contraption that mimics neuron signaling (nerves are made of the same cells as our brain. They are literally an extension of our brain in our body), then we connect these switches to 43 artificial nerve pairs that connects to an encoder, lodged right behind your brain stem, the back of your neck (where Matrix protagonists gets plugged in).

Sounds too unrealistic ? Well we managed to make a paralyzed man able to walk again with similar rudimentary tech in may 2023. A spinal implant connected to the pair nerve controlling his legs, connected to a brain implant. The trick here is to miniaturize these implants so they can communicate data perfectly between neural cells and artificial nerves, instead of decoding vague general brain waves.

We will probably use nanotech to insert these artificial nerves, like 3D printing polymers using acoustic sono-ink.

Data Collection

Once we have successfully implanted these little polymers inside the brain stem of thousands of participants, we will let them go about their daily lives. People with diverse or formidable lives will be selected. Artists, cook, gymnasts, extreme sportsman, commando marines, parkour stuntmen, medieval reconstruction artists, tribesmen, hunters, world travelers, restaurant tester, wine experts, etc.

People who have incredible daily unique sensory experiences will record in real time every single one of their movement, from back flips to tongue spasm and everything they feel, see, hear, smell and taste. Smart tattoos, smart fabric and other types of implants will indicate their movements, body position, the type of molecules that penetrated their nose and mouth, etc. Connected lenses will record what they see, etc.

We will thus collect nervous data from artificial nerves in the same time as sensory data from other external implants and gadgets. With specialized super-AI, this massive amount of information will allow us to decode the language of nerves, alas !

Data Upload

After we are done training massive AI models on collected sensory data (and artificial ones), we will design specialized neuromophic chips that can translate audiovisual data from video-games, into complete-sensory nervous signals.

Neuromorphic chips will then speak to our implanted artificial nerves who will speak to our brain, while overriding any signal that our real nerves would transmit (except the ones regulating vital organs), by flipping the implanted switches.

It will then connect your brain to a Virtual Body, that will be your interface between the virtual world and your mind. Muscles, heart, lungs, sweat, digestive system, you will feel everything. You can eat as much as you want and simulate satiety only when you want to.

Security Issues

I'm undecided about the vital organ nerves. If you are doing parkour in Renaissance Florence as Ezio Auditore, would you want to feel the burn in you muscles, your heart pounding really hard, and breathing really loud ? For a full immersive experience, how are we going to simulate exhaustion and effort, without putting ourselves in danger ? The problem here is you might hyperventilate and faint of oxygen poisoning, because you will still be using your real lungs.

To avoid this issue, we can let the Chip control your lungs and heart and keep them at a normal pace in accordance to your need (like when you are asleep), so we need to trick your autonomous nervous system into believing that you are asleep, so it can activate. You will then control your virtual lungs...however this solution comes with a cornucopia of hazards: someone will be able to hack your vital organs and make you die of a heart attack ! Or just a benign bug or a power cut...many safety valves will have to be thought through.

Turning your body into a robot-slave ?

Also keep in mind that if the Chip can control your heartbeat, it could also control the rest of your body. It would make it do exercise, clean the house, cook, eat, clean itself, paint the fence, get vitamin D outside, do many useful work, while your mind is chilling in the metaverse. No need to buy an expensive teslabot. You will hence be able to remain linked as long as you wish, without health issues.

However, you can imagine how dangerous these already troubled waters will get with that application.

FDVR level 1&2

We talked of FDVR systems that can only control your peripheral nervous system. But there are many many more nerves interlinked inside your brain, which could be described as a huge bundle of nerves.

After w...


Content cut off. Read original on https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/195bs08/roadmap_to_full_dive_virtual_reality_fdvr/

343
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/Bitterowner on 2024-01-13 00:40:18+00:00.


For me, its an Rpg maker project i've been working on for around a year as a hobby, i feel that the effort i put in now is pointless, due to Lets say GPT5 possibly being released this year, in which case it would be able to quickly finish it up for me.

344
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/Bchalup2348 on 2024-01-12 23:59:34+00:00.


I'm a college student in the US, and I've always dreamed of being a doctor and helping people.

Sadly, with AI most likely replacing doctors in the next couple of years, I was wondering whether it is worth it to study hard in college and try to get into med school. Being a full fledged doctor from my current point will require 7-10 years, and becoming a specialist like an oncologist will require more than that.

Is it worth it to try and become a doctor at this point or should I just take life easy and wait for AI to take all of our jobs?

345
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/Celery_Fumes on 2024-01-12 22:57:12+00:00.


What does this mean for the investment in open AI and the field in general?

346
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/joe4942 on 2024-01-12 22:46:24+00:00.

347
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/atlanticam on 2024-01-12 21:01:47+00:00.


Where do we go from here?

348
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/hardcore4m on 2024-01-12 20:57:08+00:00.

349
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/Mk_Makanaki on 2024-01-12 20:16:32+00:00.


1.A pool cleaning robot:

Aiper's pool cleaning robots, part of the Scuba Series, from at CES 2024. The robot is designed to make pool cleaning effortless, maneuvering independently to collect debris.

  1. A case that gives your iPhone a physical keyboard (I feel like i need this lol)

  2. A 4-passanger eVOTL vehicle (flying electric car) that can "operate as quietely as a dishwasher" by Supernal, a company owned by Hyundai

  3. Unifrutti's Harvesting Robot:

  4. Humanoid Robot That can clean your home

because i can't add more than 5 videos in a post will just include a link to the remaining ones.

6. A drone that can carry 66 pounds over 25 miles on a single battery by DJI (Huge for drone delivery):

7. MOBINN delivery robot that can climb staircases and obstacles effectively:

8. A wearable oven (a Jacket) that can slow-cook your food:

Particularly useful for people who do a lot of camping trips at survivor driver areas. Where the nearest petrol station is 8 hour drive away.

Purposefully didn't include any of the "big companies" announcements (Samsung, LG, etc) since they already have a lot of coverage. Receive the latest robot videos and news as they drop here. I'm on the optimistic side but are you "scared" of a future with robots?

350
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/shogun2909 on 2024-01-12 20:12:52+00:00.

view more: ‹ prev next ›